I probably owe my passion for espionage history to none other than a singular encounter with the infamous Alger Hiss! When writing my doctoral dissertation, I had the opportunity to interview him. I spent weeks preparing questions, and for the most part, the interviews went smoothly. I decided to be a little crafty and deliberately held back one final question, the answer of which I thought could serve as the ultimate test of his truthfulness. When I posed the question, an awkward stare lasted momentarily, and I sensed a “gotch-ya” moment. From then on, I knew I had the stuff in me to be a pretty good historian of espionage.
I treasure this book not only because I possess one of the few hardback copies inscribed by all three authors but also because I consider Spies the most authoritative book about KGB espionage operations in America during the 1930s and 40s. Without question, if I could own own only one book about Soviet espionage in America, this would be it!.
I’ve known the principal author, John Haynes, for over thirty years. Though we do not always agree on who was or was not a Soviet spy, I have the utmost respect for his scholarship and encyclopedic knowledge of KGB operations. What I feel is particularly important about this book is that it integrates information from available Soviet archival sources into the narrative. Not surprisingly, the authors reveal the names of numerous Americans who were Soviet spies but were never even under suspicion. Read carefully: you may find a relative is named in the index of spies!
An unprecedented expose of Soviet espionage in the United States during the 1930s and 40s
This stunning book, based on KGB archives that have never come to light before, provides the most complete account of Soviet espionage in America ever written. In 1993, former KGB officer Alexander Vassiliev was permitted unique access to Stalin-era records of Soviet intelligence operations against the United States. Years later, living in Britain, Vassiliev retrieved his extensive notebooks of transcribed documents from Moscow. With these notebooks John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr have meticulously constructed a new, sometimes shocking, historical account.
I doubt there has ever been a more controversial book written about an espionage case than Perjury! For decades, Professor Weinstein’s 1978 book on the Alger Hiss case generated heated arguments between Hiss’s supporters and detractors. I was a participant in that battle and I tell you, it was brutal. Both sides took no prisoners when arguing over the legitimacy of the author’s interpretation of evidence and conclusions. For over 25 years, Hiss cheered his supporters on and went to his grave, still proclaiming his innocence.
The historian’s task is to separate historical fact from fantasy. I recommend Weinstein’s expanded second edition version because in its pages, he does just that, plus he integrated the provocative evidence from Russian archives that emerged after the first edition was published.
Bottom line, this book provides the most objective and convincing account of the drama that led to Hiss’s conviction.
Although almost a half-century has passed since the jury at Alger Hiss's second trial pronounced him guilty of perjury, the case remains controversial and the verdict leaves questions unanswered. The case has continued to make headlines and attract considerable media attention in the years since Perjury was first published in 1978, and this new edition of the book incorporates evidence available only in the past two decades, bringing the essential public story of the episode up to the present. The author has sought and gained access to many previously undiscovered, unavailable, or ignored sources of documentary and oral evidence, both…
It is April 1st, 2038. Day 60 of China's blockade of the rebel island of Taiwan.
The US government has agreed to provide Taiwan with a weapons system so advanced that it can disrupt the balance of power in the region. But what pilot would be crazy enough to run…
I like this book for its thoroughly researched narrative and unbiased conclusion. The authors did what historians worth their salt are required to do: follow the evidence. I consider this book my number one choice out of the dozens upon dozens written about the case over the past six-plus decades. Though dense (it’s over 600 pages long) I found it a real page-turner!
I delved into the details of the Rosenberg espionage prosecution when I was asked to join in a lawsuit against the federal government that sought to unseal the Rosenberg grand jury records. We won and the unsealed grand jury records put to rest a belief held by Rosenberg supporters that Julius and Ethel were mere innocents framed by the government.
The records also conclusively established the reality of the misjustice that was carried out by the government in executing Ethel. Ahh, if only every research endeavor would reveal such truths!
This highly acclaimed book-hailed as the definitive account of the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg case-now includes a new introduction that discusses the most recent evidence. It provides information from the Khrushchev and Molotov memoirs, the Venona papers, and material contained in a Discovery Channel documentary that was first aired in March 1997.
British spy rings of the 1930s and 40s fascinate me. Their members appear more colorful and audacious than their American counterparts. I think it rings especially true for the chaps of the “Cambridge Spy Ring.” Their escapades are recounted in dozens of books but I consider Newton’s the best, partly because he does what no other historian had done: chronicle the missing American dimension of the Cambridge Spy Ring saga.
Newton is a fine historian as well as a grand storyteller, and I love a book that reads like a mystery novel! I also have great respect for writers who possess the knack for projecting a sense of “place” in their books. Newton does this so well that, when I lived in Washington DC, and after completing my evening read of his book, I’d venture out onto gaslit cobblestone streets and wander by the l brick-faced Georgian style residences ever hoping I’d encounter one of the Cambridge spies!
Three British diplomats and spies, Donald Maclean, Kim Philby, and Guy Burgess, did everything in their power to see to it that the Soviet Union prevailed in post-WWII clashes with the United States.
It is April 1st, 2038. Day 60 of China's blockade of the rebel island of Taiwan.
The US government has agreed to provide Taiwan with a weapons system so advanced that it can disrupt the balance of power in the region. But what pilot would be crazy enough to run…
Of all the biographies I’ve ever read, Miranda Carter’s psychological tale chronicling “the lives” of Anthony Blunt is my all-time favorite! When I taught my university espionage history course, my students typically knew nothing about espionage history. I made Carter’s book their first reading assignment as I needed to kick the course off with a quick-paced, enthralling story of a real-life spy. Carter’s book was perfect.
Carter characterizes this treacherous Communist as a “spy with no shame.” So true! In his public life, Blunt wore a mask that allowed him to appear as a renowned art historian who hobnobbed with the Queen. But another mask is evident—that of a conniving spy recruiter who, as a closeted homosexual, seduced and blackmailed undergrad boys into becoming Communists and, in some cases, spies.
In my experience, no other book does a better job of showing readers what it is like to live a duplicitous, compartmentalized existence.
When Anthony Blunt died in 1983, he was a man about whom almost anything could be - and was - said. As Surveyor of the Queen's Pictures and Director of the Courtauld Institute, Blunt's position was assured until his exposure in 1979 left his reputation in tatters. Miranda Carter's brilliantly insightful biography gives us a vivid portrait of a human paradox. Blunt's totally discrete lives, with their permanent contradictions, serve to remind us that there is no one key to any human being's identity: we are all a series of conflicting selves.
Harry Dexter White was the highest-ranking figure in the Roosevelt and Truman administrations ever accused of espionage. But until now, his case never captured popular or scholarly attention. Why? Just days after boldly declaring his innocence before the infamous House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC), White was dead. Once the Washington press corps declared HUAC’s questioning technique triggered White’s heart attack, the Committee immediately dropped further investigation of this high-ranking Treasury Department official and turned attention to State Department official Alger Hiss.
But for years after his death, White remained a target of Red-baiting Republican congressmen and conspiracy-minded Americans. Was this gifted public servant actually a spy? This book critically examines the allegations and evidence and reaches a controversial conclusion that has stood the test of time.
